Computer & Communication Industry Association

NetChoice & CCIA v. Moody

Litigation to Protect Online Speech

CCIA and NetChoice stopped Florida SB7072, best described as a “must-carry” statute for the internet, from becoming effective and took this challenge to the U.S. Supreme Court. 

CCIA and NetChoice are co-Plaintiffs challenging Florida SB 7072, which would force digital service companies to display third-party content and make regular disclosures of their content management policies, practice, and instances of use. SB7072 would prevent digital services from exercising their First Amendment right to determine what, when, and how to display content. Lawmakers openly announced that their intent is to “rein in” digital service companies in retaliation for perceived anti-conservative bias.

Summary

CCIA and NetChoice jointly petitioned the Supreme Court to review the Eleventh Circuit’s partial affirmance in NetChoice & CCIA v. Moody, a largely successful First Amendment challenge to Florida’s content moderation statute. The State of Florida appealed its loss, and CCIA cross-petitioned on the handful of provisions on which CCIA did not win. On the final day of the term, which stretched to July 1, 2024, the Supreme Court held that both cases must return to lower courts for decision on the scope and application of TX HB 20 and FL SB 7072. But the Court also held that the First Amendment protects online speech and editorial decisions from governmental intrusion. The Court agreed that, as we have argued throughout these cases, states cannot dictate what social media applications and websites may display. As Justice Kagan wrote for the majority, “a State may not interfere with private actors’ speech to advance its own vision of ideological balance.” 

Statements

Filings

State

Florida

Timeline

May 2021

CCIA and NetChoice filed suit against the Florida Attorney General, Elections Commission, and Department of Management Services over SB 7072, arguing it was unconstitutional under the First Amendment, 14th Amendment (Equal Protection and Due Process), Commerce Clause, and preempted by Section 230.

June 2021

A Florida federal district court blocked SB 7072, finding that it infringes digital services’ First Amendment rights.

May 2022

Eleventh Circuit appeals court affirmed that decision, finding that several parts of SB 7072 “unconstitutionally burden” free speech.

September 2022

Florida petitioned the Supreme Court to hear the case.

October 2022

CCIA and NetChoice petition the Supreme Court to hear the case, to also consider the transparency provisions.

January 2023

The Supreme Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief in the cases expressing the views of the United States.

August 2023

The U.S. Solicitor General responded to a Supreme Court request to weigh in, agreeing that this requires Supreme Court review.

September 2023

The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case.

February 2024

Supreme Court heard argument in Moody and Paxton.

July 2024

Supreme Court ruled in Moody/Paxton that the First Amendment protects online speech and editorial discretion and that TX HB20 likely violates the First Amendment.

September 2024

Judge Hinkle of the District Court sets a plan for the case to proceed after the Supreme Court decision

November 2024

CCIA and NetChoice filed an Amended Complaint adding an as-applied challenge and responding to the Supreme Court’s analysis of the facial challenge in the Moody decision

November 2024

Florida filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, which was fully briefed as of February 5, 2025.