Computer & Communication Industry Association
PublishedAugust 17, 2018

CCIA Files Brief Ahead Of Upcoming Apple App Store Supreme Court Case

Washington — As the Apple v. Pepper case heads to the Supreme Court, tech companies as well as businesses that rely on services uniting buyers and sellers are watching the outcome to see how it will impact their future business endeavors. The Computer & Communications Industry Association, which has advocated on the pro-competition side of tech antitrust cases for more than 45 years, filed an amicus brief today based on its concern that the lower court ruling threatens some internet business models by exposing these business models to duplicative damages claims.

The brief argues that the lower court failed to consider legal precedent under the Illinois Brick doctrine by granting legal standing to indirect purchasers and erroneously considering Apple as a distributor. It also points out that the current ruling would harm competition in the long run for potential new entrants and thousands of smaller businesses that rely on so-called multi-sided online business models to connect with customers in the short term.

For example, the brief explains that the “Ninth Circuit’s rule would allow an action for treble damages against any company with which the plaintiff has transacted, regardless of whether the claims arise from alleged pass-on damages, so long as that defendant can be labeled a ‘distributor.’”  This puts multi-sided business models at risk of duplicate claims and conflicts with both the Court’s precedents and the Sherman Antitrust Act.

The following can be attributed to CCIA President & CEO Ed Black:

“Multi-sided business models serve as sort of matchmakers for market participants for anything from crafts to rides and now constitute a large portion of the economy. The lower court ruling erred in understanding how these business models function and ignored well-settled antitrust doctrines to come up with a ruling that would unfortunately  expose these matchmakers to duplicative treble damages..”

“Rather than face this liability and high damages, companies will feel pressured to follow the single-sided model and focus on their own proprietary products, or at least reduce the number of business partners. This decrease in choices would be unfortunately for thousands of small businesses and consumers.”

For media inquiries, please contact Heather Greenfield hgreenfield@ccianet.org

News

CCIA Publishes Paper on Top Digital Trade Barriers in the G20 Ahead of Trade Ministerial

Washington – The Computer & Communications Industry Association released a paper on its members’ top G20 digital trade priorities on Monday, ahead of the G20 Trade Ministerial in Milwaukee fro...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Trade
News

CCIA Urges FTC to Clarify Personalized Pricing Guidance and Preserve Consumer Discounts

Washington - The Computer & Communications Industry Association has filed comments with the Federal Trade Commission in response to its request for public comment on a proposed enforcement policy ...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Competition
News

Tech Industry Concerned by DC Court Ruling in Pentagon Anthropic Dispute

Washington - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has ruled that the Pentagon had a sufficient basis for identifying Anthropic as a “supply chain risk,” and it dismissed ...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
    Artificial Intelligence
News

CCIA Asks DHS to Reconsider $103,265 H-1B Visa Fees, Citing Risks to U.S. AI Leadership

Washington - The Computer & Communications Industry Association filed comments urging the Department of Homeland Security to withdraw its proposal to impose a $103,265 fee on H-1B petitions, warni...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Immigration