Computer & Communication Industry Association
PublishedJanuary 12, 2012

Judiciary Committee May Study Cybersecurity Provision Before Implementing It As Part of PIPA

Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy has put out a statement saying he may add a provision to study the impact of DNS blocking before that provision within the controversial PROTECT IP bill (PIPA) would take effect. The offer to suspend the timing of DNS blocking comes after cybersecurity experts in the Obama administration and those implementing the latest cybersecurity measure known as DNSSEC have warned PIPA and the latest cybersecurity measures the government has spent the last ten years developing are incompatible. Internet engineers and cybersecurity experts have written to Congress about their serious concerns.

The following can be attributed to Computer & Communications Industry Association President & CEO Ed Black

“I hope this statement signals a recognition they didn’t understand this issue when the bill was drafted. We hope this means they will step back, talk to stakeholders, identify and focus on the real problem they’re trying to solve and target that. But it seems more likely to be aimed at newer opponents of the bill that haven’t absorbed how harmful the legislation would still be, even if there was a firm commitment to remove DNS blocking, which there isn’t.

“This DNS blocking was the tip of the iceberg in terms of the broad range of real problems with the approach of SOPA and PIPA. The DNS blocking was easy to understand and remove. Those who value the functioning of the Internet and the jobs that depend on it should now focus on the provisions of the legislation that still cause much collateral damage to the Internet.

“Those pushing this flawed bill discounted a lot of early concerns voiced by Internet experts about the bill. The DNS blocking was just one glaring flaw that would harm cybersecurity. There are a lot of other concerns they seem to continue to ignore about the collateral damage to the Internet that are also well founded. If the offer to further study the DNS blocking provision were a sign of real willingness to step back in general and rethink this bill, then it would be meaningful.”

News

CCIA Warns Alaska Social Media Bill HB 318 Raises Serious Constitutional and Privacy Risks

Washington – The Computer & Communications Industry Association is raising concerns about HB 318, legislation currently under consideration in the Alaska House that would regulate minors’ soci...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
    Online Safety
News

CCIA Raises Constitutional and Compliance Concerns with Hawaii Bills SB 2761 and SB 3001

Washington – The Computer & Communications Industry Association is raising concerns about SB 2761, “Relating to Social Media,” and SB 3001, “Relating to Artificial Intelligence,” both un...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
    Artificial Intelligence
News

CCIA Raises Privacy and Compliance Concerns with Maryland Bills SB 932 and HB 883

Washington – The Computer & Communications Industry Association is raising concerns about SB 932 and HB 883, both under consideration today in Maryland legislative committees. CCIA opposes both ...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
    Artificial Intelligence
News

CCIA Welcomes USTR Focus on Digital Trade in Annual Trade Barriers Report

Washington –The U.S. Trade Representative published the 2026 National Trade Estimate Report, an annual report detailing foreign trade barriers faced by U.S. exporters and laying out a roadmap for U....
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Trade