Computer & Communication Industry Association
PublishedJuly 1, 2026

CCIA Raises Privacy and Liability Concerns with California Wearable Devices Bill, SB 1130

Washington – The Computer & Communications Industry Association is testifying today before the California Assembly Committee on Privacy and Consumer Protection in opposition to SB 1130, warning that the legislation is overly broad and could impose criminal and civil liability on manufacturers, retailers, employers, and other businesses. 

While CCIA supports efforts to safeguard individual privacy, SB 1130’s definition of a “wearable recording device” risks capturing a wide range of everyday technologies, like communication headsets, action cameras, and body-mounted cameras. CCIA also raises concerns that the bill’s undefined standards create significant legal uncertainty. The legislation fails to clearly define key terms and relies on an ambiguous “reasonable expectation of privacy” standard that could lead to inconsistent enforcement for lawful conduct. The association also warns that the bill’s “primary purpose” test for anti-circumvention technology is subjective and difficult for manufacturers, distributors, and retailers to apply in practice.

CCIA recommends clarifying that liability rests with the individual who unlawfully records others, not the companies that manufacture or sell the wearable devices. The association also urges lawmakers to replace the bill’s “primary purpose” standard with a knowledge-based requirement and to adopt more specific, defined recording prohibitions modeled on existing California law to provide businesses and consumers with clear compliance standards while protecting privacy.

The following statement can be attributed to Aodhan Downey, State Policy Manager, West Region at CCIA:

“Everyone deserves strong privacy protections, and those protections need to be paired with clear, workable rules. SB 1130, as drafted, risks holding manufacturers, retailers, and other businesses liable for the actions of individuals while creating uncertainty around what products and conduct are actually covered. California can protect privacy without discouraging innovation or exposing responsible businesses to broad and unpredictable liability.”

News

Australia’s Revised News Bargaining Incentive Remains a Discriminatory Tax on U.S. Digital Services

Washington – The Australian government introduced a package of legislation today to establish its News Media Bargaining Incentive, including a measure that would impose a financial penalty on a narr...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
    Tax
News

CCIA Files Comments as Canada Considers Age Verification Requirements

Washington – As Canada’s Office of the Privacy Commissioner considers potential age assurance measures, the Computer & Communications Industry Association offered comments. CCIA argued that al...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Privacy
News

Senate Commerce Committee to Markup Several Bills Aimed at Online Safety on Wednesday

Washington – The Senate Commerce Committee is scheduled to markup several bills on Wednesday that aim to tackle various online safety issues, including S. 1748, Kids Online Safety Act; S. 4199, Yout...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
    Online Safety
News

CCIA Files FAA Comments on a Framework for Drone Regulation

Washington – The Federal Aviation Administration has asked stakeholders for comments due today on its proposed framework for regulating drones. The Computer & Communications Industry Association...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Innovation Policy