Computer & Communication Industry Association
PublishedFebruary 27, 2026

CCIA Urges Vietnam to Recalibrate Timeline of its AI Law

Washington — The Computer and Communications Industry Association calls on Vietnam to adjust its timeline for implementing the new Artificial Intelligence (AI) Law to provide a more reasonable and practical pathway for interested companies to come into compliance. Currently slated to take effect on March 1, 2026, the law—and its unfinalized implementing regulations— impose significant obligations on companies seeking to deploy AI-enabled services in Vietnam. Given the evolving regulatory framework and limited time available for companies to assess requirements and implement necessary compliance measures, delaying implementation, particularly relating to certification and enforcement, is both prudent and necessary.

CCIA has advocated that governments take a carefully sequenced approach when implementing AI laws due to the rapidly evolving nature of AI, the complexity of deploying AI systems across sectors, and ongoing challenges in finalizing necessary technical standards. This position is consistent with CCIA’s engagement in other jurisdictions, including the EU and Korea, where CCIA has emphasized phased implementation, clear guidance, and realistic compliance timelines—positions reflected in their 18- and 12-month enforcement moratoria, respectively. 

Given the prescriptive nature of Vietnam’s AI law and the need to build up conformity assessment capacity, an 18-month moratorium would provide similar stability. Absent such flexibility, Vietnam risks creating regulatory uncertainty that could deter market entry and limit the benefits of AI investment.

The following can be attributed to CCIA’s Vice President of Digital Trade, Jonathan McHale:

“CCIA supports Vietnam’s ambition to build a strong and globally competitive AI ecosystem, and greatly appreciates its close consultation with industry in developing its regulatory framework. However, effective AI regulation requires not only clear rules, but also realistic timelines. As we have seen in the case of the EU AI Act and Korea’s Basic AI Law, rushed implementation creates regulatory uncertainty, compliance bottlenecks, and the need for subsequent clarifications to address unintended consequences. Providing a reasonable implementation period will give companies the certainty and time they need to comply in good faith, avoid unnecessary disruption, and continue investing in Vietnam’s growing digital economy.”

News

UK Consumers to CMA: Don’t Put App Store Safety and Security at Risk

London – The UK Competition and Markets Authority has just closed its consultation on new Conduct Requirements (CRs) that would constrain how the Apple and Google app stores protect consumers agains...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Competition
News

New Study Finds EU Space Act Could Cost U.S. Companies Billions While Benefiting Chinese Competitors

Washington — According to a new white paper released today by The Computer & Communications Industry Association, the European Union Space Act (EUSA) could greatly hamper U.S. space competitiven...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Space & Spectrum
News

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Reaffirms Bar on Restrictive Texas Internet Law, HB18

Washington – The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed a preliminary injunction that blocked Texas from enforcing its social media law HB18, known as the Securing Children Online through Paren...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Online Safety
News

CCIA Response to $1 Billion Google DMA Fine Announced by European Commission 

In response to the European Commission announcing a nearly $1 billion fine for Google under the EU’s Digital Markets Act, the following can be attributed to Daniel Friedlaender, Senior Vice Presiden...
reading-tablet
  • Statements
  • Tax