Computer & Communication Industry Association
PublishedJuly 18, 2013

CCIA, Others Ask For More Transparency On Surveillance Practices

In a letter to President Obama, Attorney General Eric Holder and key House and Senate leaders, a diverse group of more than 50 trade associations, companies, public interest organizations and investors call for more transparency when the government issues security-related data requests.

The letter is signed by organizations that are not often on the same side. In the letter we ask that companies be allowed to report statistics that would give clues about the scope of government surveillance programs such as the number of government requests for information using their authority under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act or the US PATRIOT Act, as well as the number of individuals or accounts requested and what type of data was requested. We ask those who support the idea to sign a White House petition.

Specifically, those signed on to the letter want the Justice Department to agree to let Internet, phone and web-based service providers publish information on the government requests and that Congress pass legislation demanding transparency form the feds and allowing it from companies by clarifying the law so companies don’t have to get permission from a FISA court before releasing this information to the public.

The Computer & Communications Industry Association has been testifying before Congress for years warning of the dangers of the lack of oversight on government surveillance programs. The following can be attributed to CCIA President & CEO Ed Black:

“Without greater transparency, the public and different branches of government cannot provide the checks and balances that a program like this clearly requires in a democracy.

“We don’t doubt the good intentions of the government workers charged with carrying out this surveillance, but any program like this has negative side effects that ought to be weighed holistically. Right now those who could provide information on the economic, trade or diplomatic consequences are left out of the discussion or don’t have enough information to weigh in and we’re seeing now just how devastating the lack of debate and oversight can be.”

For more see Black’s Huffington Post opinion piece Tuesday:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/edward-j-black/secrecy-democracy-and-the_b_3599317.html

Black worked on information and government security issues at both the Commerce Department and State Department before leading CCIA.

reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Trade

U.S. Industry Raises Concerns on European Cloud Services Scheme Ahead of EU-U.S. TTC Meetings

Washington – The Computer & Communications Industry Association and other industry groups sent a letter to the U.S. Administration detailing concerns with the recent developments on the forthcom...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Trade

CCIA Statement Following Initial Conclusions on U.S.-Taiwan Initiative on 21st-Century Trade

Washington – The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative announced that they concluded negotiations on the first part of the U.S.-Taiwan Initiative on 21st Century Trade. The first agreement under t...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Privacy

CCIA Agrees With New York Privacy Bill Goals, But Requests Further Amendments On Compliance Details

Washington –  The Computer & Communications Industry Association filed comments today opposing New York privacy legislation that would set different standards and definitions than other pri...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Privacy

CCIA Submits Comments, Testifies Against Harmful Maine Privacy Bills

Washington – CCIA submitted comments and will testify before the Maine State Legislature Monday morning in opposition to three consumer data privacy bills, highlighting concerns around interoperabil...