Computer & Communication Industry Association
PublishedMarch 3, 2010

Wall Street Journal latest to shine light on IV’s shady dealings

Ever had a leaky ceiling? You can place a bucket under it and delay the inevitable, but ultimately the steady dripping is going to take its toll and that bucket is going to overflow. Eventually, the ceiling may even collapse.

The latest drip in the unraveling of secretive Intellectual Ventures came last week in the form of a Wall Street Journal article. Writer Don Clark pokes holes in Nathan Myhrvold’s claims that his “invention company” makes no profits from patent infringement lawsuits:

“[IV VP of Licensing Don] Merino says some such deals have a ‘back end.’ In other words, his firm can receive some revenue generated by the company that buys its patents, whether through a lawsuit or some other means. But IV does not control what the buyer does with them.”

IV has long bragged of its record of never having filed a patent infringement lawsuit. However, these WSJ revelations suggest that they are achieving the same end product – revenue – by licensing patents to NPEs more than willing to sue. They are simply going through the back door.

Indeed, this is not the first article to note IV’s propensity to sell patents to litigious NPEs. A recent Dow Jones article revealed that several IV shell companies licensed eight patents to two firms that happened to be headquartered in Marshall, TX—a place known for its high number of patent lawsuits.

A September Recorder article titled “Intellectual Ventures Takes Indirect Route to Court” opened the lid on IV having sold patents to a firm that used them to sue Kodak for infringement:

“With its new practice of selling off patents to third parties, litigation is much more likely. It’s similar to the ‘catch and release’ model used for some time by other patent-holding companies. That’s a friendly sounding name for a threat that goes like this: Take a license because we’re going to sell the patent on the open market—and you never know what unscrupulous and lawsuit-prone troll is going to buy it.”

As the steady drip continues, one can only wonder how long the infamous IV machine can sustain its image of benevolence.

News

EU Online Age Checks Make Privacy Trade-Offs Unavoidable, CCIA Europe Warns

Brussels, BELGIUM – The European Commission’s new Kids Act, introducing tiered age-based access restrictions for social media, games, AI chatbots, video-sharing platforms, and other online service...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
    European Union
News

CCIA Asks Supreme Court to Hear Patent Case that Involves Process to Review Weak Patents Used by Patent Trolls

Washington – The Computer & Communications Industry Association has joined several other trade associations, including SIIA, in an amicus brief in the case of Kahoot! v. Interstellar, asking the...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Patents
News

CCIA Applauds House Passage of High-Capacity Grid Act

Washington – The Computer & Communications Industry Association applauds the House passage of Rep. Julie Fedorchak’s High-Capacity Grid Act as an important, practical step to meet the rising d...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Innovation Policy
News

CCIA Files Joint Amicus Brief on Social Media, Algorithms in Free Speech Case

Washington – The Computer & Communications Industry Association and SIIA have filed joint amicus briefs in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in three related cases involving a California social...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Online Safety