Litigation to Protect Online Speech
CCIA is a co-plaintiff, along with NetChoice, in challenging several state laws that would restrict users’ access to lawful content that is protected by the First Amendment.
Summary:
CCIA is a co-plaintiff, along with NetChoice, challenging the constitutionality of HB3, Florida’s latest internet law that would restrict users’ access to lawful content that is protected by the First Amendment.
Statements:
- CCIA Challenges Constitutionality of Florida’s Social Media Rationing Law
- CCIA, NetChoice File Renewed Request to Block Florida’s Social Media Rationing Law
- Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction to Block Florida’s Social Media Rationing Law
Filings:
State
Florida
Timeline
October 2024
CCIA and NetChoice filed suit against the Florida Attorney General over HB 3, arguing it was unconstitutional under the First Amendment and preempted by federal law.
November 2024
Judge Walker ordered the parties to engage in discovery relevant to the Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
February 2025
Judge Walker heard oral argument on the Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
March 2025
Judge Walker denied the Motion for Preliminary Injunction, finding that “Plaintiffs have not demonstrated a substantial likelihood of establishing standing”; he then dismissed the case without prejudice on the same ground.
June 2025
Judge Walker grants injunction against several provisions, including banning 14 to 15-year olds from having accounts without parental consent and banning all minors under 14.