Computer & Communication Industry Association
PublishedMarch 22, 2024

The DoJ’s Lawsuit Against Apple Follows the EU’s Playbook 

notification This post was originally published 21/03/2024 by Project DisCo

After months of speculation and a four-year investigation, the Department of Justice’s (DoJ) Antitrust Division, alongside multiple state & district attorneys general, filed a lawsuit against Apple. In its suit, the DoJ is accusing the company of violating antitrust laws by blocking rivals from accessing hardware and software features of its iPhone. This is the most recent example of U.S. authorities taking a more interventionist approach to innovative markets, following other digital sector lawsuits by the DoJ and the FTC last fall.

This lawsuit marks the third time the DoJ has targeted Apple in the last 15 years. However, it is the first instance where the DoJ alleges that the company is maintaining a monopoly position illegally. Here, the DoJ contends that Apple has leveraged its products to ensure the iPhone keeps its position in the device market. Some of the alleged conduct include the Apple Watch’s performance with iPhones and other smartphones, Apple’s limits for its iMessage service with other devices, and Apple’s payments system on the App Store.  

These features have been a key differentiator of the iOS ecosystem for consumers: a managed, integrated, seamless experience that “just works.” Consumers that prefer more open ecosystems have alternatives to choose between, which compete against the more curated iOS environment. Depending on what consumers most desire, they choose between ecosystems, trading off different attributes depending on their needs. 

Read the full article on Project DisCo

Article
AI and Copyrights: Why Using Copyrighted Material for Training is Fair Use

AI and Copyrights: Why Using Copyrighted Material for Training is Fair Use

A collected series of cases captioned as In re OpenAI Copyright Infringement Litigation presents the latest and most important opportunity to resolve an emerging and critical question in copyright law...
  • Copyright
Article
Ending H-1B Grace Period Fails Cost-Benefit Test

Ending H-1B Grace Period Fails Cost-Benefit Test

Executive Summary Costs of ending exceed savings by about $121 million to $762 million a year across the three scenarios, with a central estimate of $263 million. Over ten years, the net cost i...
  • Immigration
Article
Applying Semiconductor and Server Tariffs to Data Centers, Under Section 232 or Section 301, Would Now Cost the U.S. About $180 Billion a Year

Applying Semiconductor and Server Tariffs to Data Centers, Under Section 232 or Section 301, Would Now Cost the U.S. About $180 Billion a Year

An update to CCIA’s June 2026 analysis: the Section 232 data center exemption remains under review, a Section 301 excess capacity determination could be weeks away, and the buildout at stake has gro...
  • Trade
Article
The KFTC’s Defense Leaves the Evidence Unanswered

The KFTC’s Defense Leaves the Evidence Unanswered

The Korea Fair Trade Commission’s (KFTC) October 21 response (in Korean) to reporting on an Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) study offers three explanations for higher penalti...
  • Competition