Computer & Communication Industry Association
PublishedFebruary 5, 2026

CCIA Challenges Unconstitutional App Store Law in Utah

Washington – The Computer & Communications Industry Association has sued the state of Utah in federal court to block SB142, the App Store Accountability Act, as a violation of the First Amendment. This law, much like the Texas law that was recently enjoined in CCIA v. Paxton, imposes a sweeping age-verification, parental consent, and de facto compelled speech regime on both app stores and app developers that would block access to lawful speech and likely intrude upon users’ privacy.

The law would require all persons who presently hold or wish to hold an account with an app store to submit to a burdensome and invasive age-verification process. If the app store “determines” that the user is under 18 years of age, the law prohibits them from downloading virtually all apps and software programs and from making any in-app purchases unless their parent consents and is given control over the minor’s account. Minors who are unable to link their accounts with a parent’s or guardian’s, or who do not receive permission, would be prohibited from accessing app store content.

The law would also effectively require app developers to “age-rate” their content into age categories established by the state. Developers would also be required to notify app stores in writing every time they improve or modify the functions, features, or user experience of their apps. 

CCIA has fought for First Amendment rights for businesses, consumers and internet users for more than 25 years. For more information on this lawsuit, please see our Fact Sheet.

The following can be attributed to CCIA Senior Vice President, Chief of Staff, and Director of CCIA Litigation Center Stephanie Joyce:

“This Utah law raises many of the same constitutional concerns that caused another court to block the Texas app store law. When a state erects a barrier to the vast library of online speech unless the speaker jumps through a series of age-gating hoops, it must receive exacting constitutional scrutiny. Under well-settled precedent, that scrutiny warrants judicial intervention to ensure that adults and young people can continue to access the lawful online speech of their choice.”

News

CCIA Urges Balanced Approach to AI and Privacy Legislation Ahead of Illinois Senate Subcommittee Hearing

Washington – The Computer & Communications Industry Association is raising concerns about a series of artificial intelligence and data privacy bills ahead of today’s hearing before the Illinoi...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
    Online Safety
News

Brazil Courts’ Injunctions Put Innovators Under the Gun in Patent Hold-Ups

Washington – A new report highlights the growing importance of Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) to Brazil’s digital and industrial transformation, while warning that the country’s current legal...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Patents
News

DC Federal Court Denies Motion to Stay Pentagon’s Action Against Anthropic; CCIA Comments on Ruling

Washington - A DC Appeals court has rejected Anthropic’s motion to block the Pentagon from designating the company as a supply chain risk following a dispute over how the Pentagon may use its AI tec...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
    Innovation Policy
News

New Analysis Finds California COMPETE ACT Could Cost State $1 Trillion in GDP and 1.6 Million Jobs Over 10 Years

Washington - A new economic analysis released today by the CCIA Research Center warns that California Assembly Bill 1776 (AB 1776), known as the COMPETE Act, could impose sweeping economic harm on the...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Competition