Computer & Communication Industry Association

EU Court Backs Data Protection Enforcement Consistency

Brussels, BELGIUM — The EU Court of Justice has ruled that data protection authorities, under limited circumstances, can go after companies that do not have the main establishment in their EU Member State.

Consistent interpretation and enforcement of data protection rules ensure that organisations operating in several Member States cannot be judged twice for the same practice and that individuals have their rights protected uniformly across the EU. Unlike its predecessor, the General Data Protection Regulation includes substantive and procedural rules to ensure consistent interpretation and enforcement of data protection rules in cases involving organisations operating in multiple EU jurisdictions. 

Under the so-called One-Stop-Shop mechanism, organisations should be accountable to a single, lead data protection authority. It is then for this authority to work with any other “concerned” authorities in order to reach a common decision. Lawmakers also agreed on suspensive measures for judicial proceedings to avoid “irreconcilable judgments resulting from separate proceedings”. 

In today’s decision, the EU Court ruled that a data protection authority has a general competence over cross-border processing if a company has its main establishment in its jurisdiction. Other authorities in the EU may only commence legal proceedings against companies under certain conditions, providing that they work jointly with their peers to ensure consistent enforcement at European level.  

Any enforcement inconsistencies could bring long-term uncertainty for organisations seeking to comply with the GDPR, and it could increase liability exposure and compliance costs. It would also conflict with EU lawmakers’ original promise that the GDPR would reduce “costly administrative burdens, leading to savings for businesses of around €2.3 billion a year.” 

The following can be attributed to CCIA Europe Senior Policy Manager Alex Roure:

“While the Court allows European data protection enforcers to launch multiple proceedings against companies, they may only do so after observing due process and dialogue with other agencies. This is the right approach to ensure the consistent application of data protection rules in Europe. 

“Enforcement consistency and clarity should always prevail, especially when authorities choose to deviate from the One-Stop-Shop mechanism. We urge national authorities to be cautious about launching multiple proceedings that would weaken legal certainty and further complicate data protection compliance in the EU.”

News

CCIA Raises Concerns as Florida Senate Takes Up AI Bill of Rights During Special Session

Washington – The Computer & Communications Industry Association today raised concerns as Florida lawmakers prepare to revisit the proposed Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights during the state...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Artificial Intelligence
News

CCIA Comments in Response to UK Publishing its Annual Digital Service Tax Collection Amounts

London – Today, the UK’s HM Revenue and Customs published its annual tax receipts for 2025-26, including the total amount made payable to its digital services tax (DST), which totalled £944m (aro...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
    Trade
News

DMA Reality Check Needed as First Review of EU ‘Gatekeeper’ Law Approaches

Brussels, BELGIUM – With the European Commission’s first formal review of the Digital Markets Act (DMA) expected in the coming days, the tech sector is calling for a rigorous, evidence-based asses...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
    Competition
News

CCIA Continues to Raise Concerns with Alaska Social Media Bill HB 318

Washington – As Alaska lawmakers continue to consider HB 318, the Computer & Communications Industry Association is urging careful review of the proposal, citing ongoing concerns about its impac...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Online Safety