Computer & Communication Industry Association
PublishedMarch 17, 2015

Not Again! Marketplace Fairness Act Reintroduced in Senate

Washington — Last week, the Marketplace Fairness Act (MFA) was reintroduced in the Senate by Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), Sen. Mike Enzi (R-Wyo) and Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.). The bill, like its previous incarnations, would force online retailers to collect sales and use taxes regardless of physical presence. It would do so without addressing any of the serious small business concerns, such as the burden of having to collect taxes for almost 10,000 tax jurisdictions, and the risk of audits across state lines. While spring is usually thought to be a season of hope and new beginnings, this bill signifies a futile turn back to a retrogressive approach that would scapegoat and penalize innovation.

Since last year, the House Judiciary Committee, under the leadership of Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), has been discussing ways to address these small business concerns. However, in introducing a bill so similar to its problematic predecessors, MFA proponents have shown their disinterest in finding a way to actually adapt an outdated tax system to better match the new reality of the online marketplace. Instead, they insist on the MFA and its punitive targeting of online retailers to dump the burden of collecting sales taxes for a geographically based system on innovative sellers whose business models are not geographically based. Perhaps it was sadly predictable that those who see holding back innovation and forcing the 21st century economy to conform to a 20th century tax system as “leveling the playing field” would be incapable of having the flexibility to entertain any alternatives to their approach.

Our industry understands the desire of state and local governments to collect online sales and use taxes. However, they need to understand that they cannot simply dragoon small online retailers into collecting it for them, while themselves evading their responsibility to address a fractious and chaotic tax system. There is nothing fair about the Marketplace Fairness Act. Rather, it is a manifestly unjust attempt to make small business innovators pay for daring to succeed in the online marketplace. The Marketplace Fairness Act title remains about as descriptive as the Holy Roman Empire, which according to Voltaire was neither holy, nor Roman, nor an empire.

News

CCIA Study Finds South Korea Fines U.S. Companies Up to Seven Times More Than Korean Firms Relative to Business Activity

Washington – A new study by the CCIA Research Center finds that South Korea’s competition authority imposes penalties on U.S. companies at rates four to seven times higher than those applied to Ko...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
    Competition
News

CCIA UK Responds to CMA Investigation of Microsoft’s Business Software Ecosystem

London – The UK Competition and Markets Authority today announced the next stage in its Strategic Market Status (SMS) investigation regarding Microsoft's business software ecosystem. This includes a...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Competition
News

Appeals Court Finds Florida’s Law Restricting Social Media Can Be Enforced

Washington – The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that Florida’s HB3, restricting access to social media for teens, can be enforced ahead of the First Amendment issues being fully heard...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Online Safety
News

Tech Industry Response as Supreme Court Hears Case Involving Privacy, Video Content

Washington – The Supreme Court heard arguments today on whether a decades-old law protecting privacy of video cassette rentals should be applied to online multimedia content and advertising. The Vid...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Privacy