Computer & Communication Industry Association
PublishedDecember 16, 2024

AI and Privacy: EDPB Opinion on Data Processing for AI Model Training

CCIA Europe recently spoke with experts Théodore Christakis (Professor of International and European Law) and Etienne Drouard (Partner at Hogan Lovells) about the European Data Protection Board’s (EDPB) upcoming opinion on data processing for AI model training. 

In this video, they explore the challenges of balancing privacy protection with innovation, as well as the need for practical, flexible guidance that addresses real-world applications while fostering legal certainty. 

Can the European Union craft privacy solutions for the AI age that are protective yet feasible? 

Christakis: “The EDPB opinion will be a litmus test for Europe’s ability to move from theoretical discussions to practical solutions that enable AI and data-driven innovation. Striking this balance is essential if Europe wants to protect privacy, while competing effectively on the global stage.”

Drouard: “Scraping of data and training AI should be compatible with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and legitimate interest. This means protecting people – not asking for their consent, but minimising and filtering data, providing rights to individuals.”

Drouard: “The EDPB has no legal power, it’s also not a legislative institution. Therefore, it cannot play any role in interpreting the AI Act and its interplay with the GDPR. And I hope we will get a roadmap rather than prohibitions, especially on legal grounds or legal bases.”

Christakis: “The biggest challenge is drafting guidance that is protective, yet feasible in the real world.”

Boniface de Champris

Senior Policy Manager, CCIA Europe
Article
AI and Copyrights: Why Using Copyrighted Material for Training is Fair Use

AI and Copyrights: Why Using Copyrighted Material for Training is Fair Use

A collected series of cases captioned as In re OpenAI Copyright Infringement Litigation presents the latest and most important opportunity to resolve an emerging and critical question in copyright law...
  • Copyright
Article
Ending H-1B Grace Period Fails Cost-Benefit Test

Ending H-1B Grace Period Fails Cost-Benefit Test

Executive Summary Costs of ending exceed savings by about $121 million to $762 million a year across the three scenarios, with a central estimate of $263 million. Over ten years, the net cost i...
  • Immigration
Article
Applying Semiconductor and Server Tariffs to Data Centers, Under Section 232 or Section 301, Would Now Cost the U.S. About $180 Billion a Year

Applying Semiconductor and Server Tariffs to Data Centers, Under Section 232 or Section 301, Would Now Cost the U.S. About $180 Billion a Year

An update to CCIA’s June 2026 analysis: the Section 232 data center exemption remains under review, a Section 301 excess capacity determination could be weeks away, and the buildout at stake has gro...
  • Trade
Article
The KFTC’s Defense Leaves the Evidence Unanswered

The KFTC’s Defense Leaves the Evidence Unanswered

The Korea Fair Trade Commission’s (KFTC) October 21 response (in Korean) to reporting on an Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) study offers three explanations for higher penalti...
  • Competition