Computer & Communication Industry Association
PublishedAugust 17, 2018

CCIA Files Brief Ahead Of Upcoming Apple App Store Supreme Court Case

Washington — As the Apple v. Pepper case heads to the Supreme Court, tech companies as well as businesses that rely on services uniting buyers and sellers are watching the outcome to see how it will impact their future business endeavors. The Computer & Communications Industry Association, which has advocated on the pro-competition side of tech antitrust cases for more than 45 years, filed an amicus brief today based on its concern that the lower court ruling threatens some internet business models by exposing these business models to duplicative damages claims.

The brief argues that the lower court failed to consider legal precedent under the Illinois Brick doctrine by granting legal standing to indirect purchasers and erroneously considering Apple as a distributor. It also points out that the current ruling would harm competition in the long run for potential new entrants and thousands of smaller businesses that rely on so-called multi-sided online business models to connect with customers in the short term.

For example, the brief explains that the “Ninth Circuit’s rule would allow an action for treble damages against any company with which the plaintiff has transacted, regardless of whether the claims arise from alleged pass-on damages, so long as that defendant can be labeled a ‘distributor.’”  This puts multi-sided business models at risk of duplicate claims and conflicts with both the Court’s precedents and the Sherman Antitrust Act.

The following can be attributed to CCIA President & CEO Ed Black:

“Multi-sided business models serve as sort of matchmakers for market participants for anything from crafts to rides and now constitute a large portion of the economy. The lower court ruling erred in understanding how these business models function and ignored well-settled antitrust doctrines to come up with a ruling that would unfortunately  expose these matchmakers to duplicative treble damages..”

“Rather than face this liability and high damages, companies will feel pressured to follow the single-sided model and focus on their own proprietary products, or at least reduce the number of business partners. This decrease in choices would be unfortunately for thousands of small businesses and consumers.”

For media inquiries, please contact Heather Greenfield hgreenfield@ccianet.org

News

CCIA Comments in Response to UK Publishing its Annual Digital Service Tax Collection Amounts

London – Today, the UK’s HM Revenue and Customs published its annual tax receipts for 2025-26, including the total amount made payable to its digital services tax (DST), which totalled £944m (aro...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
    Trade
News

DMA Reality Check Needed as First Review of EU ‘Gatekeeper’ Law Approaches

Brussels, BELGIUM – With the European Commission’s first formal review of the Digital Markets Act (DMA) expected in the coming days, the tech sector is calling for a rigorous, evidence-based asses...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
    Competition
News

CCIA Continues to Raise Concerns with Alaska Social Media Bill HB 318

Washington – As Alaska lawmakers continue to consider HB 318, the Computer & Communications Industry Association is urging careful review of the proposal, citing ongoing concerns about its impac...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Online Safety
News

CCIA Raises Free Expression and Legal Concerns with California Technology Bills

Washington – The Computer & Communications Industry Association is raising concerns about SB 1142, the “Digital Dignity Act,” and AB 2169, the “Digital Choice Act,” ahead of today’s he...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Online Safety